v2004 -> v11, picture fields
Mehboob Alam (10/30/08 11:58AM)
Mehboob Alam (10/30/08 11:58 AM)
Koen,
Just to clarify, my information is from the recent Summit
presentations. Sometimes it's difficult to tell whether the
performance demonstrations and other technical details were related to
the current 11.2 release, or the forthcoming 11.3 released.
I was just communicating the intent of the design, as presented... I
dont have a beta copy, so I cannot confirm anything, but I'm content
enough to sit tight and wait for the 11.3 release before I plan my
migrations.
sincerely,
mehboob alam
To make a bad day worse, spend it wishing for the impossible.
--- On Thu, 10/30/08, Koen Van Hooreweghe <bvbaCompass@...
wrote:
After doing some further testing, I came to the conclusion
there must
be something fundamentally wrong with this option. Or my
understanding is wrong. Anyway, in the current
implementation makes
4D client over the internet unusable when a record contains
one or
more picture (or blob) fields.
Reply to this message
Summary created 10/30/08 at 2:39PM by Intellex Corporation
Comments welcome at: feedback@intellexcorp.com